<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>insideCTI &#187; java</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insidecti.com/wordpress/tag/java/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insidecti.com/wordpress</link>
	<description>Things could get ugly when computing and telecom collide.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 12:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Innovation abound in voice APIs</title>
		<link>http://insidecti.com/wordpress/development/innovation-abound-in-voice-apis/</link>
		<comments>http://insidecti.com/wordpress/development/innovation-abound-in-voice-apis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Liu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nu echo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicexml]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidecti.com/wordpress/?p=44</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dominique Boucher of Nu Echo makes a good observation in the world of voice APIs: In fact, the new approaches are not programming models, they essentially provide low-level instructions for the various voice platforms. Much like a virtual machine. It’s up to the user of the platform to implement its own programming model on top [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Dominique Boucher of Nu Echo makes a <a href="http://blog.nuecho.com/2010/01/25/voice-apis-back-to-basics/">good observation</a> in the world of voice APIs:</p>
<blockquote><p>In fact, the new approaches are not programming models, they essentially provide low-level instructions for the various voice platforms. Much like a virtual machine. It’s up to the user of the platform to implement its own programming model on top of these instruction sets. And this is a very attractive offer, as this will most certainly ignite the development of new application programming environments and frameworks, some of which will be platform agnostic.</p>
<p>We lived a somewhat similar period at the end of the last century. There were many non-interoperable proprietary IVR platforms, and the industry came up with a solution: VoiceXML. Will we see something similar happen with these new approaches? I doubt it. I think that all these approaches are sufficiently similar that a good abstraction layer on the application side can suffice to support them all easily. In the 90’s, porting an application to a new platform was plainly impossible without a complete rewrite.</p></blockquote>
<p>As we&#8217;ve seen new programming languages and paradigms flourish in recent years, it appears that the voice API space mirrors the same trend. Just as software engineers entered the &#8220;post-Java era,&#8221; we may be on the verge of a &#8220;post-VXML era&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insidecti.com/wordpress/development/innovation-abound-in-voice-apis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

