<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>insideCTI &#187; iv</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insidecti.com/wordpress/tag/iv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insidecti.com/wordpress</link>
	<description>Things could get ugly when computing and telecom collide.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 03:47:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>QuickFuse is not quick enough to the Web telephony game</title>
		<link>http://insidecti.com/wordpress/news/quickfuse-is-not-quick-enough-to-the-web-telephony-game/</link>
		<comments>http://insidecti.com/wordpress/news/quickfuse-is-not-quick-enough-to-the-web-telephony-game/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 19:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Liu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plum voice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quickfuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidecti.com/wordpress/?p=765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As much as I love to see another competitor in the crowded Web telephony space, I&#8217;d have to agree with Om on this one: QuickFuse (by Plum Voice) is not quick enough. Voxeo, Tropo, Twilio, Teleku, etc. have pretty much stolen the buzz in this space and then some, so I can only see QuickFuse&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>As much as I love to see another competitor in the crowded Web telephony space, I&#8217;d have to <a href="http://gigaom.com/2010/06/21/quickfuse-joins-the-web-telephony-party-late/">agree with Om</a> on this one: <a href="http://quickfuseapps.com/">QuickFuse</a> (by <a href="http://www.plumvoice.com/">Plum Voice</a>) is not quick enough. Voxeo, Tropo, Twilio, Teleku, etc. have pretty much stolen the buzz in this space and then some, so I can only see QuickFuse&#8217;s entrance as a play on even more competitive pricing &#8212; shrinking margins for everyone.</p>
<p>Plum itself has a good list of high-profile customers, and I wonder if QuickFuse was introduced to acquire more businesses in the small and medium segment. Maybe the big clients still aren&#8217;t spending money on IVR projects in this economy.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a fan of the convergence between Web and telephony technologies, so I certainly wish the best to the folks at QuickFuse/Plum. After all, it is through competition that drives innovation, and we all agree that there&#8217;s still plenty of room to innovate in Web telephony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insidecti.com/wordpress/news/quickfuse-is-not-quick-enough-to-the-web-telephony-game/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

