<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guest post: Future for the IVR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insidecti.com/wordpress/internet/future-for-the-ivr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insidecti.com/wordpress/internet/future-for-the-ivr/</link>
	<description>Things could get ugly when computing and telecom collide.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:24:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is VoIP a diversion? &#124; insideCTI</title>
		<link>http://insidecti.com/wordpress/internet/future-for-the-ivr/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Is VoIP a diversion? &#124; insideCTI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidecti.com/wordpress/?p=149#comment-25</guid>
		<description>[...] also reminded of Naveen Narayan&#8217;s guest post making a case against more investment in voice [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] also reminded of Naveen Narayan&#8217;s guest post making a case against more investment in voice [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene</title>
		<link>http://insidecti.com/wordpress/internet/future-for-the-ivr/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 03:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidecti.com/wordpress/?p=149#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Not sure if the IVR will eventually die, but it will definitely evolve. The IVR of the future is probably going to be very different than that of today. Who knows, it may evolve into a holographic avatar that you speak to naturally, and it will understand what you want. Instead of IVR, we will call it IPR (Interactive Personal Response)? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure if the IVR will eventually die, but it will definitely evolve. The IVR of the future is probably going to be very different than that of today. Who knows, it may evolve into a holographic avatar that you speak to naturally, and it will understand what you want. Instead of IVR, we will call it IPR (Interactive Personal Response)? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene</title>
		<link>http://insidecti.com/wordpress/internet/future-for-the-ivr/comment-page-1/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 03:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidecti.com/wordpress/?p=149#comment-149</guid>
		<description>Not sure if the IVR will eventually die, but it will definitely evolve. The IVR of the future is probably going to be very different than that of today. Who knows, it may evolve into a holographic avatar that you speak to naturally, and it will understand what you want. Instead of IVR, we will call it IPR (Interactive Personal Response)? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure if the IVR will eventually die, but it will definitely evolve. The IVR of the future is probably going to be very different than that of today. Who knows, it may evolve into a holographic avatar that you speak to naturally, and it will understand what you want. Instead of IVR, we will call it IPR (Interactive Personal Response)? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

